Research

Our group develops dynamical models of biological intelligence: how organisms, and groups of them, decide, remember and search, and what mechanisms make that possible. The work links stochastic neural dynamics, Bayesian inference, and adaptive decision making.

Simulated school with social discounting.Run the interactive demonstration
Illustration of interconnected decision makers

SOCIAL DECISION MAKING

Social decision making

A group faces the same speed–accuracy tradeoff as an individual, but its members can watch one another. A neighbor’s flight is evidence of danger and its stillness is evidence of safety, and a single rate at which animals discount a threat when others stay still lets a group be both faster and more accurate than a lone individual.

Social information is worth something in other settings too, since others have sampled the patch, but coupling that is too strong drags a forager out of a patch it should have stayed in. Recruitment, inhibition, and individual differences all set where a collective lands between those failures.

Social escape simulation
Illustration of noisy evidence trajectories

DECISION MAKING

Decision making and Bayesian inference

When the world changes, old information can become misleading. I study how decision makers balance incoming evidence, prior experience, and the possibility of change.

Questions include when to stop gathering evidence, how to learn environmental change rates, and when seeking information is more valuable than chasing a reward, and when to abandon a depleting patch.

Evidence-accumulation simulation
Illustration of a localized bump of neural activity

NEURAL DYNAMICS

Neural dynamics and working memory

Neural activity can persist after a stimulus disappears. I study how these patterns encode information, wander under noise, and interact with the structure of a network.

Working-memory errors offer a window into these dynamics, and into the way experience shapes our expectations.

Bump-attractor simulation